Skip to content

Conversation

@go-while
Copy link
Owner

@go-while go-while commented Jun 8, 2025

No description provided.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 8, 2025 17:15
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR updates the CodeQL workflow configuration to optimize resource usage and streamline job steps. Key changes include reducing the allocated RAM for self-hosted runners from 12GB to 8GB, adding an initial repository checkout step, and modifying the condition for setting up Go to run for all go jobs rather than only autobuild jobs.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)

.github/workflows/codeql.yml:30

  • The RAM allocation has been reduced from 12 to 8; please verify that 8GB is sufficient to handle the workload on self-hosted runners to avoid potential performance issues.
ram: 8

.github/workflows/codeql.yml:128

  • Changing the condition for the Go setup step by removing the 'build-mode == "autobuild"' check might unintentionally include Go jobs that don't require this configuration. Please confirm if this broader condition is intentional.
if: matrix.language == 'go'

@github-advanced-security
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

@go-while go-while merged commit d7fc850 into main Jun 8, 2025
@go-while go-while deleted the codeql branch June 8, 2025 17:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants